My daughterʼs (7) meets copyright law for the first time:
“There are so many things you canʼt copy nowadays. Like my multiplication table.”
“How come? Your teacher doesnʼt allow it?”
“No, because itʼs protected by copyright law [itʼs printed on the pre-printed table we bought, with tiny little letters on the side]. Copying it is a crime.”
"XXX needs your permission to enable desktop notifications" - no you *really* don't. Because I *already* *actively* took away your capability to do notifications because *I* *do* *not* *want* your notifications!
Since when did it become OK for software to try and pull a Carthāgō dēlenda est on its users?
To just blatantly ignore user choice and keep nagging? This is even a service I am paying for, for crying out loud.
I hate how technology has become a means for companies to remotely manipulate u̶s̶e̶r̶s̶ herds of assets instead of a tool of enlightenment and liberation.
It didn't use to be like this.
It wasn't supposed to be like this.
software rant, BigBlueButton
@emacsen
It wouldnʼt be too hard if Big Tech would support OAuth2 properly. In that case even Google/Facebook auth would be as simple as setting up a generic OAuth2 provider with specific, publicly known endpoints.
@emacsen
I still believe that good authentication consists of something you know (like a password) and something you have (like a FIDO2 device). Unless you enforce that the given FIDO2 device is protected with a “something you have” method (like a PIN; fingerprint and face recognition is not a good method in this case), you only have a “what you have” part, which can easily be stolen.
@grin
Essence of the whole world, really.
Father. Coder. Maker. Linuxer. Child forever.
🇭🇺. 😺s. I ♥ my job and nature. I commute on 🚉. I donʼt mind explicit content, but rarely generate it. He/him.